Schedule structure grades based on back-to-backs (25%), compression (20%), travel (18%), home/away balance (15%), late-season (12%), and early-season (10%). Tap any team bar for full breakdown.
Overall Schedule Grade โ All 32 Teams
๐ Best Structure
Calgary & Detroit
Both graded A+. Calgary: 9 B2Bs. Detroit: best rest-net (+6) and lowest travel in the league.
โ ๏ธ Hardest Schedule
San Jose Dโ
16 B2Bs + 48,861 est. miles + worst rest net (โ6). A punishing combination in every single category.
๐ Key Finding
Schedule โ Standings
Carolina (D early season) went 53-22-7. Montreal (D overall) made playoffs at 48-24. Structure is a factor, not destiny.
This tab layers actual 2025-26 season results onto the schedule structure grades. Did teams with easier schedules outperform expectations?
And what about the "Thanksgiving Rule" โ in hockey, if you're in a playoff position around Thanksgiving (late November), you almost always finish there.
The early-season schedule grade is a direct predictor of how easy or hard it is to build that early cushion.
๐ฆ The Thanksgiving Test โ Early Schedule Grade vs. Playoff Outcome
Teams with an A or A+ early-season schedule grade had an easier path to banking points in October-November. Here's how early structure correlated with final outcomes:
Top-10 Schedule Grade โ Made Playoffs
โ
of the 10 best-structured schedules
Bottom-10 Schedule Grade โ Missed Playoffs
โ
of the 10 worst-structured schedules
A/A+ Early Grade โ Made Playoffs
โ
teams with A/A+ early-season grade
D Early Grade โ Made Playoffs
โ
teams with D/D- early-season grade
Schedule Grade vs. Season Outcome โ All 32 Teams
| Team | Sched Grade | Early | Late | Wins | Pts | 2025-26 Result | Schedule Impact |
|---|
| # โ | Team โ | Grade โ | B2Bs โ | Miles โ | Rest โ | Pts โ | Early โ | Late โ | Result |
|---|
Back-to-Back Burden
Estimated Travel Miles
Best Rest Net
Worst Rest Net
Schedule Grade vs Season Points
Color by: